Score one for the Catholics…

So, Tony sent me this link from FOX News…ironically… Apparently, an astronomer from the Vatican has said that Intelligent Design has no place alongside evolution in the science classroom. He’s the highest-ranking Catholic to make such a statement.

a). FOX News finally put out some useful information that isn’t conservative in nature.
b). The Catholics apparently aren’t completely incompetent in leadership as previously believed
c). Now, we just need to get the Catholics to admit that open communion and women in the clergy are alright and we’ll be making some progress…

Hey, it’s a step in the right direction, right?

Soccer = Pat Robertson

So, Thursday night, I went to Praise Band practice and, at the same time, some yearly pre-school event was going on…the parking lot was full of vehicles…and therefore, I come to the following conclusion:

Soccer moms will cause the end of the world.

Let me explain… Soccer moms drive mini-vans…and more recently, because they didn’t like the stigma surrounding them and their bretheren, they started driving SUVs. More and more SUVs. The largest ones possible. The more soccer moms there are, the more SUVS and mini-vans that drive on the roads, and it is those vehicles that cause greenhouse gases to knock down the ozone layer and increase global warming.

Therefore, rather than killing off all the soccer moms to solve this problem, I say that we eliminate soccer as a sport. It isn’t that entertaining anyway. And we’d save the world while doing it…literally…

Who’s with me?

Good vs Evil

You know, I tend to try avoiding preaching when I post on here…as in, trying to talk about Christianity as a religion in any way, shape or form…yet, the subject does enter into my opinions on things like teaching Intelligent Design in our public (non-Christian) schools. Therefore, let me digress from “the norm” a bit…and in light of that, let me quickly propose my definition of a “good Christian:”

One who believes not only that Jesus Christ is the son of God and that He gave His life for us, but also that this person lives their life as an example of what God envisions for His people.

If you have an addendum to that statement, please post a comment. Personally, I think it’s the latter part of that definition that gives people some contention, since many of us tend to disagree as to what “God envisions for His people.”

I, therefore, wish to put forth a statement from someone I consider to be a “bad Christian:”

“I’d like to say to the good citizens of Dover (Pennsylvania): if there is a disaster in your area, don’t turn to God, you just rejected Him from your city. And don’t wonder why He hasn’t helped you when problems begin, if they begin. I’m not saying they will, but if they do, just remember, you just voted God out of your city. And if that’s the case, don’t ask for His help because he might not be there.”

This statement is not an example of what a “good Christian” would say, for obvious reasons. A good Christian does not wish ill will upon others. As the Bible dictates, Jesus was all about living his life and being an example of what we should be doing, even though that may be difficult. At no point in my recollection of the Bible (and I could be wrong…and I’ll correct this if proved otherwise…) does Jesus ever wish God’s wrath upon anyone. Note: the statement written above does not explicitly express “ill-will,” but I think it’s implied…again, perhaps I’m wrong on that…

Pat Robertson, you are indeed a terrible Christian and a very bad example of what Christians are taught and seeking to accomplish. You are, however, doing an incredible job of putting lies in the heads of non-Christians who now, due to your innate stupidity, have no good reason to change their minds about the religion. Good job, you worthless, lying, bastard.

Hmmmm…well…

So yeah, had my third exam today…could have gone better, probably could have gone worse. I’m having a difficult time deciding which is worse: sitting through a 3 hour Physical Chemistry exam with under 10 questions that you have to think about a lot to get a good answer down, or a 3.5 hour exam where you have maybe 20 essay questions that you do know answers to, yet you don’t really understand what the hell the question is asking you… (i.e. you can read the question, you know information on the subject and you could easily answer a multiple-choice question, but you don’t really know what the professor is getting at…so you write down too much stuff and they count off for it…).

Anyway, I’ll get that back next week, I guess…no one was particularly happy about the test, so we’ll see what happens…

On a lighter note, Brooke and I are visiting Hannibal this weekend…haven’t been there since, like, summer…’bout time, I guess… I also start my rotation with Dr. Zahm next week, so I won’t have my afternoons off anymore…dammit… Nathan, I’ll post up a research summary when I get a chance… 😛

Not much else going on…but I’m quite ready for Thanksgiving Break, yo… Holla…

Oh, cholesterol…

So, Dr. Stephenson was talking to us in class today about something he read in the Journal of Clinical Cardiology recently, saying that they believe we should all strive for the lowest total-body cholesterol count possible. Basically, we shouldn’t try to have a count of “below 200” or “around 150″…we should just go and go until it’s as low as it can go.

Anyway, he then mentioned some studies that show up years ago on the same subject… These studies said that people who had low cholesterol were less likely to die of cardiovascular diseases. However, keep in mind, this data only reflected death by cardiovascular problems, not by other factors.

Essentially, it came out that, yes, people with cholesterol counts around 130 or a little higher did well…but people lower than that started to die off. Why’d they die off? Suicides and murders. Apparently, people who had extremely low cholesterol counts died because cholesterol is a relatively key component of cell membranes, especially those in your brain…so people would start getting either really depressed and would kill themselves, or they would get psychotic enough that someone would kill them…

Take home message: eat a lot of fatty stuff and die happy, rather than depressed or crazy.

…what a weekend…

So, yeah…we were both pretty busy this weekend…again… This time, I played poker on Friday night at Jeremy’s, which was cool, as usual… Then Saturday, Stu and Joel came to St. Louis for some frolf action…there are pictures posted, but I’m sure most of you don’t care…but you should, ’cause frisbee golf rocks tremendously. We played at Watson Trails Park and Jefferson Barracks, neither of which I’d ever played at. Later that night, Stu and I went to a concert at Pop’s featuring Strapping Young Lad and Fear Factory. Who are these bands? They’re death metal bands. Yes, I went to my first death metal concert. In East St. Louis. Next door to the Penthouse club. Needless to say, it was an interesting night…

Arguably the most pertinent part of the weekend, however, came on Sunday… Brooke and I were wanting to get a pet, so we finally did. While I wanted to get a dog, it wasn’t really feasible for our current situation (i.e. I don’t have time to take one out for walks, teach it not to do its thing on my computers, etc…), so we got a cat. We went to the Humane Society on Sunday afternoon and picked out this little fella:

Sam the Cat

He’s 6 mo old and was a stray before being picked up and taken to the Humane Society. He was very well-tempered at the shelter and seems to be pretty friendly, thus far. They named him “Constantine,” but we decided that a 3 syllable name is a bit long for a cat, so we decided to call him “Sam”…seems like a name befitting a kitty cat… There are a few more pictures of him up in the Photos section now, too…

Now, time to get back to reading for this week… I don’t have to start my next rotation until November 14th, so I’ve still got afternoons off for the next 2 weeks…w00t!

Bank Error In Your Favor

So, I got paid today…and got an extra $600 ’cause they’ve been taking money out when they shouldn’t have been…

…now…what kind of amp should I buy? 😉

P.S. To make an already perfect day even more spectactular…I saw a 1993 Nissan Altima with a duck-shaped hood ornament…it was rather amusing…hehehehe…

Damn The Man

…so now that I’m living in St. Louis, I’m listening to radio quite a bit more than I was able to over the past few years. Therefore, I’m now getting exposed to Howard Stern on weekday mornings as I drive to class. As many of you may know, Stern’s show draws a great deal of FCC criticism (among others…) and, thus, he’s leaving “terrestrial radio” and heading to Sirius satellite radio beginning in early January. Therefore, he’s being replaced by a few different personalities depending on the listening region (Adam Carolla and David Lee Roth, among others).

Stern, in the past few weeks, has been really laying it on thick for how glad he is to be moving to satellite, and how much easier it will be to do his own thing, keeping the FCC and conservative groups off his back, etc. All this discussion has gotten me thinking about my thoughts on the subject, generally relating to free speech…which also spills over to video games and TV, I think.

In my opinion, which is generally correct, Stern shouldn’t be censored as much as he is. He’s being censored because the FCC and various groups don’t want children listening to his program. Stern’s show is (primarily…I think…) a morning show, beginning at 7:00 or 8:00 and going to 10:00. When will children listen to it? They’re supposed to be in school! And if they aren’t in school, they’re supposed to be supervised by an adult! During summer is the only time I could think when children would listen to the stuff…and even then, I’m pretty sure that kids would either a). not be awake yet or b). would (read: should) be under supervision of an adult.

Of course, the same thing goes for video games and TV. If you aren’t willing to raise your own kids and keep an eye on them, then you shouldn’t be complaining. If kids are “exposed” to such things, it’s (more often than not) the fault of the parents, not the fault of the person broadcasting/producing the game).

I listen to Stern ’cause there isn’t much else on. There are many times when I’ll switch to something else since I’m not being entertained anymore… There are times when it’s funny and there are times when it isn’t so funny… Stern is a very arrogant person and it shows almost every minute of the show. There are people who love the show and listen to it religiously, and I have no problem with that. But I believe that he has a right to say what he wants if he wants to under the First Ammendment to our Constitution, just like the rest of us. I can write anything I want here and not be regulated. I can actually type out everything that he says and not be regulated. It’s very easy to access…arguably more accessible since a website can be viewed from anywhere in the world, while Stern can only be heard on the radio in certain venues. The fact that he’s moving to satellite is bad not because I like his radio, but because the man is giving up and laying down before The Man. Granted, he put up a good fight over the years, but it’s finally coming to this. The FCC will only begin to regulate satellite radio as it becomes more prevalent. They’ll continue to regulate the internet and censor it. They’ll continue to regulate TV. They’re currently trying to regulate video games as well. This isn’t stopping anytime soon. Mark my words, by the time I’m 40, the face of broadcast television, radio, etc. will change dramatically to the proverbial “right” and our children will be so “protected” that they won’t be able to think for themselves. These kids will be mindless and void of creativity. Just like everything else, there need to be liberals and conservatives, good vs evil, Spider-Man vs Green Goblin… You can’t have one without the other. Howard Stern is a “necessary evil,” of sorts, to allow for the rest of us to think for ourselves and to put ideas out there that cause contention and debate.

Reading over this, I realize I’m not making a whole lot of sense, but I think the basic idea has been presented. I summarize with a good quote from a great movie: “Damn the Man.”

So yeah, any thoughts?

Just like old times…

Yeah, went to Kirksville…had a great time, needless to say. I met Brett and Syd at P.F. Chang’s here in St. Louis for dinner Friday night (good stuff…highly recommend it…the first Chinese non-buffet I’ve ever had…). I drove them to Columbia and then visited with Mom and Dad for a bit, so that was good. Anyway, I left Saturday morning with Stu and Angela for Homecoming activities at Truman…got to see little cousin Hans while watching the parade. We saw the ribbon cutting and dedication for the new Magruder Hall…and it looks pretty tight… Then we went to the football game (my first one at Truman ever…figures, eh?)…and left after they were down 31-7 at the half (hehehehe…still figures…).

Anyway, Stu, Angela and I went by a few restaurants in town (where they hadn’t been before, for the most part…) and met up with Steve and Jeremy…then Stu and Angela left and Jeremy, Steve and I started to play some poker before Steve’s ABC Party shenanigans were set to begin. Got to see Amy, Paige, and their respective friends (who were all visiting the same weekend), so that was lovely…Nathan showed up later in the night…and Matt and Josh finally showed up as Jeremy and I were leaving for the party…oh well…

So yeah, this ABC Party…which stands for “anything but clothes”…was really, really crazy… I saw more homemade thongs on guys than I ever wish to see again…not that I wanted to in the first place… Regardless, Steve wore a shirt (for most of the night…) and a blow-up doll. And that was mostly it. There was another guy with a phone book covering his ass. It was pretty disgusting. But… Relatively amusing, all the same…

There are pictures of the weekend in the Photos section of the website…you may want to check them out, if anything, to witness some crazy ABC party go-ers…

Anyway, it was great to make it up to K-town again and I had a great time. It really was just like I got to go back and pick up where I left off, and that’s always a welcome feeling.

I’ll be back again on November 18th…let’s hope for a repeat…but not of the ABC part… 😉

Random thought…

So, sitting in class today learning about the biochemical machinery that leads to transcription via RNA Polymerase…I wondered the following: What if the world were populated by robots instead of humans? Now, these are robots with robot humanoids, robotic animals, robotic plants, etc… I mean, we know practically nothing about how or why things work in our bodies…but when we think of machines, we designed them, so we know how they work and why. So if these machines did not have knowledge of their creator, or if they simply arose on their own somehow, would they find it just as difficult to figure out how and why they work? …even though, inherently (since we designed them), they “work” on a less sophisticated level than our organic bodies? Would these robots have the same questions about their origin as we do? Would they have to learn about how they function, or would they care?

…I gotta get out of here…